What one person can do to try to change Arkansas for the better

    



 On a break today I found myself thinking what I could do to help my hope for positive changes in Arkansas and then I remembered a recent podcast about an arizona lawmaker using chatGPT to make a anti-deepfake law/bill and how it was the only proposed law that required no amendments and it was passed! So I asked Perplexity.ai who I should contact in order to propose new legislation in Arkansas and found the representative for my district and I believe the senator as well so I emailed them my proposals for new laws for content labeling for youtube, anti-deepfakes, and an anti-gaslighting law as well.  While I know they might not be implemented right away it still gives me hope that change can and will happen.  I have met too many people whom I truly care about and wish I could help them all but I am only one person but this one person (me) created my website (Bit.ly/Dov24) while going thru the absolute worst time in my life, so somehow even while being harassed, bullied, demeaned, and it's likely a false narrative has been told to my family who has also hopefully unintentionally acted similarly to whom I believe responsible.  I know what I saw and heard during that year and since many nights it is replayed in my mind or I have nightmares on a few occasions, and I can remember very well what has led me to believe what I know is fact and not what I would just hear, but the truth still seems to eluding me.  If no one did anything wrong then why has it been so hard to simply get the truth either from a lawyer which I have the $ for but have yet to get one to listen long enough for me to feel fully understood, out of 5 attorneys, i only received 2 call backs on my last number but not a single voicemail, one 1 minute consult which they said it was a federal matter due to the cell phone matter, then after trying again (when I either have time or aren't depressed) and getting at least a little longer conversation but still don't feel heard.  My search for the truth is not over and will never be over until I feel heard by an attorney and then given a real reason why an exchange of information is not a feasible solution to getting answers from the liars I believe responsible for what happened to me in 2023.  If they did nothing wrong they should have no problem with this exchange of information whatsoever, Don't you think?  I have no problem with it whatsoever so why are attorney's for civil matter's such as this so hard to find??  I have made something positive out of the last year and half of my life and even helped others, and added the pricing guides for hospitals which was part of the hospital transparency act of 2021 and added links to them on my website, shown all of the free tools and websites I've learned about in my 20 years as a computer hobbyist with valid compTIA credentials for free instead of keeping them secret.  I listen always with the intent to understand people without judgement and never repeat anything that is said to me because I am a very good active listener and truly enjoy trying to help people SOLVE their problems not CREATE them.  It has been disheartening, I used to think that people would defend me when it came down to it but now i have a much more realistic view and will not be a doormat to anyone and will help whomever I chose to help, and also self-advocate, quit being gullible like I used to be and stand up for myself even if it means representing myself in the civil court proceedings I plan on filing very soon.  

 

Arkansas Anti-Gaslighting Act

created by Daniel Loper on Oct. 31, 2024 using Chat-GPT so no one else will ever suffer the same as he did in 2023.

 

Section 1: Title

This Act shall be known as the "Arkansas Anti-Gaslighting Act." or "Act appropriately, and Actively Listen Law"

 

Section 2: Purpose

The purpose of this Act is to prevent and address the harmful effects of gaslighting in personal relationships, workplaces, and public interactions, promoting mental health and safeguarding individual rights.

 

Section 3: Definitions

 

Gaslighting: A form of psychological manipulation in which a person or entity seeks to make another doubt their perceptions, memories, or reality.

Victim: An individual who experiences gaslighting that is intentional and intended to delibrately bully, harass, intimidate or at it's worst cause one to contemplate suicide.

Perpetrator: An individual or entity that engages in gaslighting behavior for a length of time that causes any mental health problems to the victim.

Section 4: Prohibitions

 

It shall be unlawful for any individual or entity to engage in gaslighting behavior that causes significant emotional distress or mental harm to another person.

Gaslighting behaviors include, but are not limited to: a. Deliberately denying facts or events to confuse the victim. b. Manipulating evidence or situations to undermine the victim's confidence in their perception. c. Dismissing or belittling the victim's feelings or experiences, d. Participating in a false narrative that hurts a person's reputation, e. Misusing emergency services or falsifying police reports which is also called police harassment by a or a group of civilians in order to bully or intimidate the victim and cause them extreme anxiety, f. socially isolating the victim or cutting off the victims communication methods with trusted family and friends by lying to the friends and family while keeping the victim in the dark about what is being said whether it is electronically sent or just spoken word,

Section 5: Remedies

 

Victims of gaslighting may seek remedies through civil action in Arkansas courts, including: a. Compensatory damages for emotional distress. b. Punitive damages for willful or malicious conduct. c. Court-ordered counseling or therapy for both the victim and perpetrator, where appropriate.

Victims may also seek restraining orders if there is a credible threat of ongoing emotional harm.

Section 6: Enforcement

 

The Attorney General's Office shall be responsible for enforcing this Act.

Training programs shall be established for law enforcement and mental health professionals to recognize and respond to gaslighting incidents.

Section 7: Effective Date

This Act shall take effect 90 days after its passage and approval.

YouTube Content Labeling and Transparency Act

Section 1: Definitions

(a) "YouTube" refers to the video-sharing platform owned and operated by Google LLC.

(b) "Content" means any video, audio, or audiovisual material uploaded to or created on the YouTube platform.

(c) "Misleading content" refers to videos containing false or deceptive information that could cause significant public harm.

(d) "Factual content" refers to videos containing information from authoritative sources or verified by independent fact-checkers.

(e) "Credibly sourced content" refers to videos from recognized experts, accredited institutions, or reputable news organizations.

Section 2: Labeling Requirements

(a) YouTube shall implement a mandatory labeling system for all content on its platform, including:

User-uploaded videos

YouTube-generated content

Advertisements

Shorts

Live streams

(b) The labeling system shall categorize content as follows:

Factual/Credibly Sourced Content

Potentially Misleading Content

Unverified Content

State-Funded Media

Section 3: Factual and Credibly Sourced Content

(a) YouTube shall label content as "Factual/Credibly Sourced" when:

It comes from authoritative sources as determined by YouTube's existing algorithms for news, politics, medical, and scientific information.

It is produced by licensed healthcare professionals who have applied for and received YouTube's health source designation.

It has been verified by independent fact-checkers.

(b) The label shall be clearly visible on the video player and in search results.

Section 4: Potentially Misleading Content

(a) YouTube shall label content as "Potentially Misleading" when:

It contains information that contradicts well-established scientific or historical facts.

It promotes conspiracy theories or unproven claims about public health, elections, or other matters of public importance.

It has been flagged by YouTube's machine learning systems or human reviewers as potentially containing misinformation.

(b) Potentially misleading content shall display a prominent information panel linking to factual information from authoritative sources.

Section 5: Implementation and Enforcement

(a) YouTube shall use a combination of machine learning systems and human reviewers to identify and label content accurately.

(b) YouTube shall provide a mechanism for users and content creators to appeal labeling decisions.

(c) YouTube shall prioritize labeling efforts for topics where accuracy is crucial, such as news, politics, health, and science.

(d) Failure to implement this labeling system may result in fines determined by the appropriate regulatory body.

Section 6: Transparency

(a) YouTube shall publish quarterly reports detailing:

The number and types of labels applied

The criteria used for labeling decisions

The accuracy rates of its labeling systems

Steps taken to improve labeling accuracy and coverage

Section 7: Educational Resources

(a) YouTube shall develop and prominently display educational resources to help users understand:

How to identify credible sources of information

The importance of fact-checking and critical thinking

The potential consequences of spreading misinformation

Section 8: Effective Date

This Act shall take effect 180 days after enactment, allowing YouTube time to implement the necessary technical changes and refine its labeling systems.

This draft law incorporates elements from YouTube's existing efforts to combat misinformation and promote authoritative content, while expanding and formalizing these practices into a comprehensive labeling system. It aims to increase transparency and help users make informed decisions about the content they consume, without overly restricting free speech or placing an undue burden on the platform.

 

YouTube Content Labeling Act

Section 1: Definitions

(a) "YouTube" refers to the video-sharing platform owned and operated by Google LLC.

(b) "Content" means any video, audio, or audiovisual material uploaded to or created on the YouTube platform.

(c) "AI-generated content" refers to any content created or significantly altered using artificial intelligence or machine learning technologies.

Section 2: Labeling Requirements

(a) YouTube shall implement a mandatory labeling system for all content on its platform, including but not limited to:

User-uploaded videos

YouTube-generated content

Advertisements

Shorts

Live streams

(b) The labeling system shall categorize content as follows:

Unaltered User Content

AI-Generated or Altered Content

YouTube-Created Content

Sponsored Content

Section 3: AI-Generated Content Disclosure

(a) YouTube shall require creators to disclose when their content contains AI-generated or altered elements that appear realistic, including but not limited to:

Deepfakes or synthetic media depicting real people

AI-generated voices imitating real individuals

Artificially altered footage of real events

(b) For AI-generated or altered content related to sensitive topics such as elections, ongoing conflicts, public health crises, or public officials, YouTube shall apply a more prominent label directly on the video player.

Section 4: Implementation

(a) YouTube shall integrate the labeling options into its video upload process.

(b) Labels shall be clearly visible in the video description for all content.

(c) YouTube shall implement AI detection tools to verify creator-supplied labels and identify potentially mislabeled content.

Section 5: Enforcement

(a) YouTube shall establish a system to penalize creators who consistently fail to accurately label their content, including:

Content removal

Suspension from the YouTube Partner Program

Account termination for repeated violations

(b) YouTube shall provide a mechanism for users to report mislabeled content.

Section 6: Privacy Protection

(a) YouTube shall establish a process for individuals to request the removal of AI-generated content that simulates their likeness without consent.

(b) YouTube shall consider factors such as newsworthiness, parody, and public interest when evaluating removal requests.

Section 7: Transparency

(a) YouTube shall publish quarterly reports detailing:

The number and types of labels applied

Enforcement actions taken

AI detection accuracy rates

Section 8: Effective Date

This Act shall take effect 180 days after enactment, allowing YouTube time to implement the necessary technical changes and educate creators about the new requirements.

This draft law incorporates elements from YouTube's recent policy changes regarding AI-generated content labeling134, while expanding the requirements to cover all content on the platform. It aims to increase transparency and accountability for both YouTube and its content creators, addressing concerns about misinformation and synthetic media23. The law also includes provisions for privacy protection and enforcement, drawing inspiration from YouTube's existing policies and potential legislative approaches45.

add if the content is from factual or credible sources too

Sources

nbcnews.com favicon

minimatters.com favicon

blog.hubspot.com favicon

youtube.com favicon

blog.youtube favicon

View 5 more

Based on the provided information and existing YouTube policies, here's a draft law that would require YouTube to label misleading videos and factual or credibly sourced video content:

YouTube Content Labeling and Transparency Act

Section 1: Definitions

(a) "YouTube" refers to the video-sharing platform owned and operated by Google LLC.

(b) "Content" means any video, audio, or audiovisual material uploaded to or created on the YouTube platform.

(c) "Misleading content" refers to videos containing false or deceptive information that could cause significant public harm.

(d) "Factual content" refers to videos containing information from authoritative sources or verified by independent fact-checkers.

(e) "Credibly sourced content" refers to videos from recognized experts, accredited institutions, or reputable news organizations.

Section 2: Labeling Requirements

(a) YouTube shall implement a mandatory labeling system for all content on its platform, including:

User-uploaded videos

YouTube-generated content

Advertisements

Shorts

Live streams

(b) The labeling system shall categorize content as follows:

Factual/Credibly Sourced Content

Potentially Misleading Content

Unverified Content

State-Funded Media

Section 3: Factual and Credibly Sourced Content

(a) YouTube shall label content as "Factual/Credibly Sourced" when:

It comes from authoritative sources as determined by YouTube's existing algorithms for news, politics, medical, and scientific information.

It is produced by licensed healthcare professionals who have applied for and received YouTube's health source designation.

It has been verified by independent fact-checkers.

(b) The label shall be clearly visible on the video player and in search results.

Section 4: Potentially Misleading Content

(a) YouTube shall label content as "Potentially Misleading" when:

It contains information that contradicts well-established scientific or historical facts.

It promotes conspiracy theories or unproven claims about public health, elections, or other matters of public importance.

It has been flagged by YouTube's machine learning systems or human reviewers as potentially containing misinformation.

(b) Potentially misleading content shall display a prominent information panel linking to factual information from authoritative sources.

Section 5: Implementation and Enforcement

(a) YouTube shall use a combination of machine learning systems and human reviewers to identify and label content accurately.

(b) YouTube shall provide a mechanism for users and content creators to appeal labeling decisions.

(c) YouTube shall prioritize labeling efforts for topics where accuracy is crucial, such as news, politics, health, and science.

(d) Failure to implement this labeling system may result in fines determined by the appropriate regulatory body.

Section 6: Transparency

(a) YouTube shall publish quarterly reports detailing:

The number and types of labels applied

The criteria used for labeling decisions

The accuracy rates of its labeling systems

Steps taken to improve labeling accuracy and coverage

Section 7: Educational Resources

(a) YouTube shall develop and prominently display educational resources to help users understand:

How to identify credible sources of information

The importance of fact-checking and critical thinking

The potential consequences of spreading misinformation

Section 8: Effective Date

This Act shall take effect 180 days after enactment, allowing YouTube time to implement the necessary technical changes and refine its labeling systems.

This draft law incorporates elements from YouTube's existing efforts to combat misinformation and promote authoritative content, while expanding and formalizing these practices into a comprehensive labeling system. It aims to increase transparency and help users make informed decisions about the content they consume, without overly restricting free speech or placing an undue burden on the platform.

 

Arkansas Deepfake Accountability Act

Section 1: Definitions

(a) "Deepfake" means any audio, visual, or audiovisual media that has been digitally manipulated or generated through artificial intelligence or machine learning techniques to falsely depict a person engaging in speech or conduct.

(b) "Distribute" means to sell, exhibit, publish, transmit, or otherwise disseminate by any means.

Section 2: Prohibited Acts

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly create or distribute a deepfake with the intent to:

Harass, intimidate, or defraud another person;

Incite or produce imminent lawless action;

Interfere with an official proceeding; or

Influence the outcome of an election.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly create or distribute a deepfake depicting another person engaged in sexual conduct without the consent of the depicted individual.

Section 3: Disclosure Requirements

(a) Any deepfake distributed in Arkansas must include a clearly visible or audible disclosure stating that the media has been digitally altered or generated.

(b) The disclosure must remain intact for the entire duration of the deepfake.

Section 4: Penalties

(a) A violation of Section 2 shall be a Class D felony.

(b) A violation of Section 3 shall be a Class A misdemeanor.

(c) In addition to criminal penalties, a person who violates this Act may be liable for civil damages to any person harmed by the violation.

Section 5: Exceptions

(a) This Act does not apply to deepfakes clearly identified as parody or satire.

(b) This Act does not apply to deepfakes created for legitimate law enforcement or intelligence purposes by government agencies.

Section 6: Effective Date

This Act shall take effect 90 days after enactment.

This draft law for Arkansas incorporates several key elements found in existing state laws on deepfakes134. It prohibits malicious uses of deepfakes, requires disclosure for legal uses, and provides both criminal and civil penalties for violations2. The law aims to balance free speech concerns with the need to protect individuals and democratic processes from harmful deepfakes7. As with other states, it focuses particularly on non-consensual sexual deepfakes and election-related misinformation35. The disclosure requirements are similar to those enacted in other states to promote transparency around AI-generated content1. This draft could serve as a starting point for Arkansas legislators to develop a comprehensive approach to regulating deepfakes.



Comments